ArticlePolymers2026
Biodegradation of Synthetic Polymers Used in Consolidation of Deteriorated Limestone Monuments.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic polymers are widely used in stone conservation, yet their long-term biological stability remains insufficiently evaluated. This study investigates the microbial susceptibility of three commonly used acrylic consolidants, Paraloid B-72, B-66, and B-44, applied to deteriorated limestone. Bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes were isolated from a deteriorated limestone false door and screened for acid production. From each microbial group, only the strong acid-producing isolates were selected for further investigation, including evaluation of their ability to utilize the three Paraloid resins as sole carbon sources and their deterioration potential on limestone cubes before and after consolidation. Deterioration was assessed by weight loss, compressive strength testing, stereomicroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). All selected strong acid-producing isolates demonstrated the ability to grow on the tested polymers, confirming their biodegradation potential. Mixed microbial cultures caused greater weight loss and compressive strength reduction than single isolates, attributed to synergistic metabolic interactions. Among the consolidants, Paraloid B-72 showed the highest susceptibility to microbial attack, while Paraloid B-66 exhibited comparatively greater resistance, attributed to the steric hindrance of its isobutyl side groups and higher surface hydrophobicity. FTIR and XRD analyses confirmed ester bond hydrolysis, progressive gypsum formation, and structural alteration of the limestone substrate. These findings demonstrate that acrylic consolidants commonly used in stone conservation are not biologically inert and may actively contribute to biodeterioration under microbial colonization, highlighting the need for developing bio-resistant conservation materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.