ArticlePolymers2026
Mechanical and Microstructural Comparison of Improved Sand with Guar Gum and Cement.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on sustainable alternatives to conventional soil stabilization has promoted the use of natural biopolymers as partial substitutes for cementitious binders. This study presents a mechanical and microstructural comparison between poorly graded Colombian sand stabilized with guar gum (GG) and Type III Portland cement. GG was incorporated at 0.25-1.00% with curing periods of 28 and 90 days, while cement contents ranged from 3 to 9% with 7 days of curing. A total of 108 cylindrical specimens were tested using unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and SEM-EDS analyses. Results show that both binders significantly improve soil strength, although cement exhibits a steeper strength gain due to hydration processes. GG-treated samples reached a maximum UCS of 470 kPa at 90 days, representing an increase of approximately 40% compared to 28 days and showing comparable performance to 5% cement. The porosity/binder index (η/B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.