ArticlePolymers2026
Bio-Inspired Cross-Spiral Carbon Fiber Composites: Impact Resistance and Damage Tolerance Under Multiple Low-Velocity Impact.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the impact resistance and damage tolerance of bio-inspired cross-spiral (CS) laminates under multiple low-velocity impacts. Two impact conditions were considered: repeated impacts at the same location and double impacts at different locations. Low-velocity impact tests, ultrasonic C-scan inspection, and compression-after-impact (CAI) tests were conducted to evaluate the impact response, internal damage, and residual compressive strength. The results show that repeated impacts at the same location intensified deformation and damage accumulation. When the number of impacts increased from 1 to 15, the peak force and maximum central displacement increased by 20.26% and 26.21%, respectively, while the absorbed energy decreased by 70.96% and the damage area increased by 113.67%. The variations in response parameters and damage area became less pronounced as the number of impacts increased. Under double impacts at different locations, increasing the impact spacing reduced damage coupling between the two impacts. When the spacing increased from 0 mm to 80 mm, the CAI strength increased by 11.02%. Overall, repeated impacts at the same location reduced the residual compressive load-bearing capacity, whereas larger impact spacing helped improve the CAI performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.