ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An FPGA-Based Event-Timing Front-End for Time-Resolved Sensing with Dual-Mode Experimental Characterization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing the Readout Electronics for a Custom 64 × 64 SPAD Array: From Single-Board Prototyping to FPGA Implementation Toward Stellar Intensity Interferometry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work presents an FPGA-based edge-event timing front-end for time-resolved sensing and event-driven measurement scenarios. The proposed design is intended as a detector-independent timing subsystem whose architectural choices are motivated by constraints that are common in single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD)-based and other asynchronous time-resolved sensing workflows, including event trustworthiness, dead-time sensitivity, and constrained downstream readout. Rather than treating the implementation as an isolated interpolation macro, this work evaluates it as an experimentally observable timing subsystem that combines carry-chain-based fine interpolation, coarse-fine timestamp formation, explicit event-quality assessment, dead-time-aware handling, and lightweight host-visible export. The experimental validation is organized around two complementary modes. An internal ILA-based mode is used to verify coherent front-end behavior under MHz-range short-pulse excitation, while a UART-based campaign identifies practical host-visible operating regions through baseline, repeatability, pulse-width, safe-versus-aggressive, and intermediate frequency-sweep experiments. The results identify a safe export-compatible operating point, a more exploratory high-rate regime, and an experimentally interpretable transition between them that, while not strictly monotonic in all metrics, does not exhibit catastrophic degradation across the explored frequency range. Taken together, the measurements indicate that the proposed architecture is best understood not as a best-case standalone time-to-digital (TDC) benchmark but as an experimentally characterized timing front-end whose practical behavior can be interpreted across complementary internal and export-visible operating regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.