ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Deep Learning-Based Heartbeat Detection from 3D Seismocardiography for Robust Heart Rate Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate monitoring of heart rate (HR) is critical for assessing cardiac functions in a wide range of health and wellness applications. Seismocardiography (SCG), which captures subtle chest vibrations using wearable accelerometers, provides a non-invasive and cost-effective approach for resting and nocturnal HR monitoring. This study presents a deep learning-based approach for accurate heartbeat detection and HR estimation from three-dimensional SCG signals. The model was trained on a large-scale dataset of resting SCG signals collected from 6600 subjects and evaluated on an independent cohort of 947 individuals. For short-term (≤5 min) resting SCG recordings, the model achieved robust performance in heartbeat detection (PPV: 0.979, sensitivity: 0.916, F1-score: 0.946). HR estimation showed high accuracy, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.27 bpm, root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.02 bpm, and correlation of 0.996 with the reference HR. To assess real-world applicability, the model was further evaluated on 28 nocturnal recordings acquired using Apple Watch accelerometer, yielding an MAE of 1.10 bpm, an RMSE of 1.88 bpm, and a correlation of 0.982. The proposed SCG-based deep learning model demonstrates robust and highly accurate HR monitoring in both resting and nocturnal conditions, highlighting its potential for integration with consumer-grade wearable devices in a server-based analysis pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.