ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning Enhanced Quantum-Safe Encryption: A Novel Optimisation Framework.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standardisation of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) by NIST marks a critical transition away from classical public-key schemes towards quantum-resistant successors. As machine learning (ML) applications proliferate, the demand for efficient cryptographic primitives intensifies, requiring implementations that are simultaneously quantum-safe and resource-aware. Recent surveys have investigated the interplay between ML and PQC, with particular focus on ML-assisted parameter optimisation, privacy-preserving ML leveraging lattice-based cryptography, and neural-network implementations of quantum-resistant algorithms. Building on these findings, we propose QSafe-ML, a comprehensive four-stage framework that integrates hardware profiling, surrogate modelling via ML, constrained multi-objective optimisation, and continuous security validation to facilitate the tuning of PQC parameters and implementations. The framework targets NIST-standardised lattice-based schemes CRYSTALS-Kyber, CRYSTALS-Dilithium, Falcon, and NTRU across three heterogeneous hardware platforms. Experimental evaluation with n=30 repeated trials demonstrates mean latency reductions of 27.5-41.9% (95% CI ±1.1-1.7 pp), memory savings of 13.3-30.2%, and energy savings of 22.8-38.2% over NIST reference baselines, with all configurations maintaining ≥128-bit post-quantum security. An ablation study confirms that surrogate-guided search accounts for the dominant share of these gains. All code, data, and benchmark instructions are released at a public repository (available upon acceptance of this manuscript) to promote reproducibility in evaluating ML-assisted cryptographic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.