ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
PPFS-YOLO: Physics-Prior Frequency-Spatial Fusion for Robust Container Surface Damage Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Container surface damage detection is critical for ensuring the structural integrity and operational safety of intermodal freight transport. However, visual pseudo-textures arising from rust stains, specular reflections, and paint weathering cause frequent false positives, while the scarcity of puncture-type defects (Hole class) leads to missed detections. Existing YOLO-family detectors address neither the frequency-domain characteristics of such pseudo-textures nor the physical priors inherent in genuine structural damage. In this paper, we propose PPFS-YOLO, a physics-prior frequency-spatial fusion framework built upon YOLOv12s. Two lightweight modules are introduced: (1) Frequency-Spatial Fusion (FSF), which applies a learnable spectral mask in the Fourier domain and performs gated fusion with spatial features to suppress pseudo-texture responses; and (2) Edge-Guided Auxiliary Supervision Module (FIM), which encodes Sobel-derived edge priors as a differentiable L1 constraint (Lphy) to regularize feature learning toward physically plausible damage boundaries. Three pairs of FSF-FIM are inserted into the YOLOv12s neck and head at P3, P4, and P4-head scales. Experiments on a container damage dataset containing 7013 images and three classes (Dent, Hole, Rusty) demonstrate that PPFS-YOLO achieves 64.86% mAP@50, a +12.35 percentage-point improvement over the YOLO12s baseline (SGD, unified optimizer), with only +0.79 M additional parameters (+8.6%) and a modest latency overhead of 2.9 ms (17.2 ms vs. 14.3 ms at 640×640 on an NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU (NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA)). Ablation analysis reveals that Lphy is the critical catalyst: without it, the combined FSF+FIM modules yield only +0.83 pp, whereas the full model achieves +12.10 pp-underscoring the synergy between frequency-domain fusion and physics-prior regularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.