Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42198031›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A PUF-Based Secure and Lightweight Authentication Protocol for Medical IoT Environments.

Hyeongeun Lim, Yohan Park, Youngho Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyeongeun LimSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.
Yohan ParkSchool of Computer Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9011-8410
Youngho ParkSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-6547

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00450915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of sensor and communication technology has enabled the Internet of Things in healthcare. In Medical Internet of Things (MIoT) environments, sensors support real-time patient monitoring, remote diagnosis, and early disease detection. However, communication between users and sensors over public channels is vulnerable to various security attacks, making secure and lightweight authentication with session key establishment essential for protecting medical data. Recently, a lightweight and anonymous authentication protocol for MIoT environments was proposed using Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs); however, we show that their protocol is vulnerable to eavesdropping, stolen verifier, and ephemeral secret leakage attacks, and fails to guarantee untraceability. To address these weaknesses, we propose a secure and lightweight PUF-based authentication protocol for MIoT environments. The security of our protocol is formally verified using Burrows-Abadi-Needham logic, the Real-or-Random model, and the Scyther tool. Furthermore, the practical validation of the proposed protocol is conducted on a hardware platform along with an evaluation of energy consumption based on the MIRACL cryptographic library. Performance comparisons demonstrate that our protocol achieves enhanced security properties with minimal computational overhead and communication costs. Ultimately, this research provides a secure and robust architectural option for healthcare applications aiming to preserve patient privacy in resource-constrained MIoT.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityInternet of ThingsAlgorithmsHumanslightweight authenticationMedical Internet of Things (MIoT)Physical Unclonable Function

Identifiers

PMID42198031
PMCPMC13210790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.