ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Imagined Speech Brain-Computer Interface: A Task-Oriented Review of Neural Decoding.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Imagined speech decoding has attracted growing interest in brain-computer interface (BCI) research, as it may enable language-related information to be recovered from non-overt neural activity. Current studies in this area are often treated as a single, unified research problem, despite substantial differences in decoding target, output constraints, and system output forms. This review examines recent imagined speech decoding research from a task-oriented perspective, with a focus on how different neural decoding tasks are defined, constrained by their output spaces, and expressed through different output pathways. The included studies are organized into four main task levels: semantic/intent, phoneme/syllable, word, and sentence/language decoding. They are further compared along two auxiliary dimensions: output-space property and output pathway, with particular attention to closed-set and open-vocabulary settings. The review shows that current studies span markedly different linguistic granularities and communication objectives, from low-bandwidth intent recognition to text or speech reconstruction. Finally, it concludes that imagined speech should not be treated as a single homogeneous decoding problem, and that a task-oriented framework provides a clearer basis for comparing heterogeneous studies and guiding future communication-oriented BCI research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.