ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Simulation-to-Real Trip-Fall Detection with Continuous-Wave Doppler Radar via Physics-Informed Kinematic Modeling and Domain Randomization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Falls among older adults are a major public health concern, yet collecting large-scale real fall data for radar-based detection is ethically and practically difficult. This study presents a controlled simulation-to-real feasibility study for trip-fall detection using continuous-wave (CW) Doppler radar. The method couples a physics-informed kinematic trip-fall model with a CW radar observation model to synthesize I/Q signals and Doppler spectrograms, while domain randomization varies body size, fall direction, initial velocity, sensor placement, aspect angle, amplitude, and noise. Synthetic walking and respiration data were also generated for controlled three-class classification among trip fall, walking, and seated quiet breathing. In Experiment I, the simulated spectrograms reproduced the dominant time-frequency characteristics of measured enacted trip-fall signals acquired with a 24 GHz CW radar; quantitative similarity analysis yielded a mean SSIM of 0.782 and a Doppler-ridge MAE of 24.6 Hz across five fall directions. In Experiment II, a ResNet-18 classifier trained only on simulated spectrograms achieved a macro-F1 score of 0.912 [95% CI: 0.883-0.936] on measured data from ten participants, three start locations, and eight directions. Under the present controlled evaluation, this exceeded the available real-data-trained baseline of 0.748 [95% CI: 0.691-0.805] (paired subject-level permutation test, p=0.006). These findings suggest that physics-informed simulation with domain randomization can reduce dependence on real trip-fall samples under limited-data conditions. The results do not establish robustness to other fall morphologies, fall-like activities of daily living, different environments, different radar devices, or embedded deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.