Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42198014›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Piezoresistive Sensing Performance of Smart Layer in Multi-Material 3D-Printed Reinforced Cementitious Beams.

Han Liu, Israel Sousa, Shelby E Doyle, Antonella D'Alessandro, Filippo Ubertini, Simon Laflamme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Han LiuDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-522X
Israel SousaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti, 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2670-4298
Shelby E DoyleDepartment of Architecture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5742-9076
Antonella D'AlessandroDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti, 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2928-1961
Filippo UbertiniDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti, 93, 06125 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5044-8482
Simon LaflammeDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0601-9664

Funding

Ministry of Universities and Research FIS0000179U.S. National Science Foundation 2349792; 243176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D concrete printing (3DP) enables automated construction with reduced material waste and enhanced geometric flexibility. However, its structural performance remains sensitive to anisotropy, mix design, and printing parameters, thereby complicating quality control. Self-sensing cementitious materials provide a promising approach by enabling intrinsic strain monitoring during fabrication and service. In this study, a hybrid multi-material printing strategy was developed using a conductive cement-based mix incorporating graphite (G), milled carbon microfibers (MCMF), and chopped carbon microfibers (CCMF), alongside a plain cement-based matrix. Based on percolation analysis, an optimal composition of 2 wt.% G, 0.25 wt.% MCMF, and 0.0625 wt.% CCMF was selected. Reinforced beam specimens were fabricated with the conductive material embedded in either the tensile (bottom) or compressive (top) region, combined with two internal architectures: diagonal infill and solid-base configuration. Four configurations were defined: Pattern 1 (bottom/diagonal), Pattern 2 (bottom/solid-base), Pattern 3 (top/diagonal), and Pattern 4 (top/solid-base). Cyclic three-point bending tests with spatially distributed electrical measurements were conducted to evaluate the electromechanical response in the elastic range. Specimens with the conductive layer located in the tensile region (Patterns 1 and 2) consistently exhibited higher gauge factors than those in the compressive region (Patterns 3 and 4). Pattern 2 exhibited the best sensing performance, with an average gauge factor of 556 and SNR of 31. Across all configurations, SNR decreased with increasing electrode spacing, with reductions of up to 31.0%, demonstrating the effect of current path length on sensing performance.

Indexed as

3D printed concretehybrid printingpiezoresistive propertiesself-sensingsmart concretestructural health monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42198014
PMCPMC13211276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.