ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Piezoresistive Sensing Performance of Smart Layer in Multi-Material 3D-Printed Reinforced Cementitious Beams.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D concrete printing (3DP) enables automated construction with reduced material waste and enhanced geometric flexibility. However, its structural performance remains sensitive to anisotropy, mix design, and printing parameters, thereby complicating quality control. Self-sensing cementitious materials provide a promising approach by enabling intrinsic strain monitoring during fabrication and service. In this study, a hybrid multi-material printing strategy was developed using a conductive cement-based mix incorporating graphite (G), milled carbon microfibers (MCMF), and chopped carbon microfibers (CCMF), alongside a plain cement-based matrix. Based on percolation analysis, an optimal composition of 2 wt.% G, 0.25 wt.% MCMF, and 0.0625 wt.% CCMF was selected. Reinforced beam specimens were fabricated with the conductive material embedded in either the tensile (bottom) or compressive (top) region, combined with two internal architectures: diagonal infill and solid-base configuration. Four configurations were defined: Pattern 1 (bottom/diagonal), Pattern 2 (bottom/solid-base), Pattern 3 (top/diagonal), and Pattern 4 (top/solid-base). Cyclic three-point bending tests with spatially distributed electrical measurements were conducted to evaluate the electromechanical response in the elastic range. Specimens with the conductive layer located in the tensile region (Patterns 1 and 2) consistently exhibited higher gauge factors than those in the compressive region (Patterns 3 and 4). Pattern 2 exhibited the best sensing performance, with an average gauge factor of 556 and SNR of 31. Across all configurations, SNR decreased with increasing electrode spacing, with reductions of up to 31.0%, demonstrating the effect of current path length on sensing performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.