Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42197994›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

FG-DeformT: Grouped Deformable Temporal Modeling for Flight-Level Aircraft Anomaly Detection.

Yinpan He, Zhen Lu, Yi Deng, Di Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yinpan HeFaculty of Data Science, City University of Macau, Macao 999078, China.ORCID 0009-0003-3926-0483
Zhen LuFaculty of Data Science, City University of Macau, Macao 999078, China.
Yi DengFaculty of Data Science, City University of Macau, Macao 999078, China.
Di WangFaculty of Data Science, City University of Macau, Macao 999078, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aircraft anomaly detection from multivariate telemetry time series is critical for flight safety and predictive maintenance. However, random window-level evaluation may overestimate performance because highly correlated windows from the same flight can appear in both the training and test sets. To obtain a stricter assessment of cross-flight generalization, this study adopts a leakage-aware flight-level validation protocol and proposes FG-DeformT, a grouped deformable Transformer for aircraft time-series anomaly detection. The model combines global temporal modeling with a grouped temporal offset mechanism to capture heterogeneous local temporal shifts across latent feature subspaces. Experiments on the ALFA dataset show that conventional baselines degrade sharply under flight-level evaluation, whereas FG-DeformT remains robust, achieving a Precision of 0.925, a Recall of 0.941, and an F1-score of 0.933 on the primary binary anomaly detection task. Ablation and downstream analyses further indicate that the grouped offset mechanism contributes to anomaly detection, while its benefit for fine-grained fault isolation is category-dependent rather than uniformly superior. External validation and computational analyses are included to further examine the framework's applicability and practical feasibility. Overall, this study highlights the importance of leakage-aware flight-level evaluation and suggests that grouped temporal deformation offers a practical way to model heterogeneous temporal patterns in safety-critical telemetry data.

Indexed as

aircraft anomaly detectioncross-flight generalizationfault isolationflight-level validationmultivariate time seriesTransformer

Identifiers

PMID42197994
PMCPMC13211050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.