ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimodal Detection of Pain and Anticipation Anxiety from Ultra-Short Duration Wearable Sensors Measurements.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the continued rise in outpatient surgical procedures, modern medicine requires more advanced tools for pain and anxiety monitoring and management. The current standard of care requires patient responses on visual analog scales, which may be subjective and are difficult to assess when a subject is unresponsive. Electrodermal activity (EDA) and pulse rate variability (PRV), two non-invasive, wearable, and objective measurements of sympathetic nervous system activity, can help provide insight into a patient's psychological or emotional state without user input, allowing for continued monitoring even when a patient is unable to respond. However, methods based on these measurements have largely been relegated to longer duration (>60 s) or post hoc analysis, which does not suit the needs of medical care environments. Here we propose new methods for handling ultra-short (<10 s) signals to allow rapid evaluation of pain and anxiety state. We show how machine learning models trained on these signals can obtain high degrees of classification performance (AUC > 0.88) between no pain or anxiety and medium or higher pain and anxiety on signals obtained during two different forms of painful stimulation. We also show how these signals can measure the degree of stimulation irrespective of perceived pain from the patient. Further development of these algorithms will allow for greater monitoring and control of patient comfort in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.