ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
From Pixel Understanding to Semantic Insight: Intelligent Detection in Sensor-Driven Perception Systems.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intelligent detection in modern manufacturing, healthcare, process industries, and structural monitoring is fundamentally enabled by heterogeneous sensor systems. Rather than being viewed as a purely image-centered recognition task, intelligent detection is more appropriately formulated as a sensor-driven state inference problem in which sensing physics, signal quality, temporal synchronization, modality availability, and deployment conditions jointly determine what can be reliably detected, localized, interpreted, and acted upon. Against this background, this review provides a structured synthesis of the field through three coupled dimensions, namely methods, systems, and governance, and organizes the literature around four recurring engineering components: signal unification, representation unification, alignment mechanisms, and robustness mechanisms. Using a structured review protocol with explicit source selection, screening, and study coding, the paper traces the methodological evolution from traditional feature-engineering and model-based pipelines to deep learning for visual, temporal, multimodal, generative, and mechanism-constrained sensing, and further to foundation-model-based and multimodal sensor intelligence. Cross-domain evidence is synthesized from industrial defect detection, fault diagnosis, remaining useful life prediction, non-destructive testing, structural health monitoring, medical lesion analysis, and process monitoring. The review argues that recent progress has substantially strengthened learned representations, multimodal interaction, and semantic extensibility, but has not removed persistent constraints arising from domain shift, missing modalities, calibration instability, privacy-preserving collaboration, and edge-side resource limits. Accordingly, the central challenge is no longer how to optimize isolated detection models, but how to build sensor-enabled intelligent systems that remain physically grounded, trustworthy, transferable, and maintainable under real operational conditions. On this basis, the paper concludes by identifying future directions in mechanism-aware modeling, trustworthy evaluation, missing-modality-robust multimodal systems, privacy-preserving cross-site collaboration, and edge-native lifecycle-aware deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.