ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Denoising Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia of Pulse-to-Pulse Interval Signals Extracted from Photoplethysmogram with an Autoregressive Moving Average Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulse rate variability (PRV), a critical biomarker of autonomic nervous system (ANS) function, is typically evaluated using the pulse-to-pulse interval (PPI) signal extracted from a photoplethysmogram (PPG). Although PPGs have been widely used in wearable devices, the PPI signal is easily affected by motion artifacts or respiratory sinus arrhythmias (RSAs). These disturbances affect the accuracy of PRV for evaluating ANS function. The aim of this study was to remove the respiratory signals from raw PPI signals with an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model.
methodsAn R-wave to R-wave interval (RRI) sequence was extracted from the electrocardiogram (ECG). A self-made measurement system was used to record PPG, ECG, and respiratory signals. Nineteen healthy adults were recruited and requested to breathe with a spontaneous breathing rate (SBR) and control breathing rates (CBRs) (6, 18, and 30 breathing rate per minute, BRPM). Their ECG, PPG, and breathing signals were recorded for 6 min under different CBRs. The measurement was performed twice, i.e., eight measurements were performed. The raw RRI(t) and PPI(t) signals of 4 Hz were segmented into samples of one minute and shifted by 30 s. Thus, a subject had 80 samples, and there were 10 samples for each BRPM. RSA-free RRI signals were generated by a spectral method to filter RSA from raw RRI(t) to produce the target RRI(t). We proposed the individual subject ARMA models trained by samples with the maximum mean absolute errors between the target RRI(t) and raw PPI(t) (MAE
resultsThe mean absolute errors between the target RRI(t) and PPI~(t) predicted by the individual subject ARMA models (MAE
conclusionsThe two proposed models are capable of removing the RSA energy coupled in the raw PPI signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.