ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Recognition of Gait Alterations Induced by Alcohol-Impairment Simulation Goggles Using Smartphone Accelerometer Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reliable identification of impairment relevant to safety-critical activities remains a significant challenge for public safety, motivating the exploration of unobtrusive and widely accessible sensing technologies. This study examines the viability of utilising inertial data acquired from consumer-grade smartphones to characterise gait disturbances associated with simulated visual impairment. The study simulates intoxication-related effects using alcohol-impairment goggles and does not involve the measurement of real alcohol intoxication. Two supervised experimental protocols were conducted in which participants traversed predefined walking routes under normal conditions and while wearing alcohol-impairment simulation goggles representing five manufacturer-declared blood alcohol concentration (BAC)-related goggle conditions plus a no-goggles control condition. An initial indoor trial, conducted in a structured corridor environment, yielded limited discrimination of gait dynamics due to strong spatial and visual stabilisation cues. To address this limitation, a subsequent outdoor experiment was conducted along a 100 m path lacking prominent visual reference points, resulting in motion patterns that more closely reflect unconstrained, real-world locomotion. Tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope signals were recorded using smartphones, followed by artefact removal, segmentation, and standardisation to ensure inter-trial comparability. The resulting curated dataset comprises 290,919 multi-channel samples derived from 96 walking trials involving 16 participants and is released as an openly accessible resource to support further research in gait analysis and classification of gait alterations associated with simulated impairment. Model evaluation was performed using an 80/20 train-test split conducted within each traversal, with training and test windows originating from the same participant and walking session. Consequently, the reported results reflect within-subject performance instead of subject-independent generalisation. Multiple deep learning architectures combining convolutional feature extraction, bidirectional long short-term memory layers, and self-attention mechanisms were systematically evaluated. Using a subject-dependent evaluation protocol, the best-performing architecture achieved an accuracy of 71.4% and a weighted F1-score of 71.5% in distinguishing gait patterns associated with different levels of simulated visual impairment. The best-performing architectures yielded classification performance consistent with exploratory, low-stakes assessment of gait alterations associated with simulated visual impairment, using accelerometer data alone. These findings illustrate the feasibility of using smartphones as auxiliary tools for exploratory, low-stakes screening or educational applications and contribute a publicly released dataset and benchmark results to facilitate methodological advancement in inertial sensor-based gait impairment analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.