ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Posterior-Contact Soft-ZUPT for Foot-Mounted Inertial Navigation: Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-Observation Modeling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Probability-Driven Adaptive Foot-Mounted Inertial Navigation with Local Straight-Heading and Stair-Height Constraints.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foot-mounted inertial navigation is an important option for pedestrian positioning when external localization infrastructure is limited, unavailable, or unreliable. Its performance, however, depends heavily on zero-velocity updates (ZUPTs), which can become overconfident during heel-strike, toe-off, and other non-ideal contact phases. This paper formulates ZUPT as probabilistic pseudo-observation modeling and introduces posterior-contact soft-ZUPT, in which update strength is controlled by a detector-derived contact prior and an innovation-conditioned posterior within a single error-state Kalman filter. Experiments on the 56-trial foot-mounted VICON benchmark under a two-fold development/evaluation protocol compare the method against hard-ZUPT, robust soft-ZUPT, contact soft-ZUPT, and a foot-instability-based adaptive covariance (FIBA)-like baseline. Posterior-contact soft-ZUPT improves difficult-trial robustness and upper-tail error suppression while remaining competitive in overall accuracy, achieving the best selected p95 and tail-risk values among the compared methods. These results indicate that probabilistic reliability modeling can soften ZUPT effectively while preserving a lightweight single-filter implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.