ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Scan Path Optimization and YOLO-Based Detection for Defect Inspection of Curved and Glossy Surfaces.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Product defect inspection is critical in industrial applications; however, it remains increasingly challenging in mass production environments, particularly for glossy or curved surface products. Conventional inspection of such surfaces typically relies on manual visual examination using gauges and operator judgment, which is time consuming and prone to inconsistency. This study proposes a robust defect detection framework for curved and reflective surfaces using a KEYENCE displacement laser sensor. The system integrates the Dijkstra algorithm, the Nearest Neighbor Algorithm, and a Genetic Algorithm to optimize the laser scanning path for structured image data generation. To validate the proposed framework, datasets were generated from both healthy and defective samples and used to train multiple deep learning models. A comparative analysis was conducted using YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and YOLOv11 architectures. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLOv11 achieved the best overall performance, attaining an mAP50 score of 0.844 while also exhibiting lower computational complexity and faster inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.