ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Deep Learning for Disease Detection: Building a Leaf Image Classifier for Roses.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and reliable detection of rose diseases is important for automating plant monitoring and timely intervention throughout the crop lifecycle. In this context, leaf-image analysis combined with machine learning offers a practical approach for disease detection in roses. This study tests a binary classification framework that distinguishes diseased leaves using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Three architectures were evaluated: a lightweight CNN trained from scratch as a baseline model, and two residual network models fine-tuned through transfer learning from weights pretrained on a large-scale visual recognition dataset. To assess robustness, two preprocessing strategies were also compared: a lightweight hue-based leaf isolation method that preserves full color information, and a grayscale conversion approach without masking. Experimental results obtained on a small held-out test set show strong classification performance across all evaluated models. At the same time, the findings indicate that additional validation is needed on more diverse datasets to confirm generalization under varying lighting conditions, background complexity, and plant growth stages. The results support the feasibility of CNN-based disease detection for roses and highlight its potential for integration into automated monitoring workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.