ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
FEM-Based Estimation-Correction with Minimal Indentation Set for Internal Cavity Classification and Geometry Estimation in Deformable Objects.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately estimating the internal structure of deformable objects from sparse measurements remains a significant challenge in robotics. This work proposes a three-stage identification framework for this problem. First, a classification strategy determines a minimal informative set of indentation locations using a generalized error computed from pre-simulated FEM force reactions of baseline cavity models and flat-punch indentation estimation. Using this set, the estimation stage detects the cavity type and provides a preliminary estimate of its geometric parameters based solely on measured indentation responses. The correction stage then refines these parameters by replaying measured indentation depths in FEM simulations and deriving geometry corrections from the discrepancy between simulated and homogeneous force responses. Robust loss functions at both stages limit the influence of measurements where local contact conditions deviate from the assumed model, improving reliability across all tested cases. Indentation depth was obtained through gripper proprioception, with an RGB-D camera limited to global pose alignment. Experiments on soft cubes with spherical, cuboid, and pyramidal cavities demonstrate that, within known cavity families and fixed material parameters, the minimal indentation set reliably distinguishes cavity types and the pipeline reconstructs dimensions within error bounds. Extending the framework to non-centered structures and unknown materials remains future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.