ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
sEMG-Based Motion Intention Recognition for Interactive Upper Limb Nursing Assistance.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic Evaluation of sEMG Processing Pipelines for Gesture Recognition.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surface electromyography (sEMG) enables non-invasive acquisition of neuromuscular activity and has shown strong potential for motion intention recognition in human-machine interaction. However, achieving reliable and real-time decoding remains critical for interactive upper-limb assistance. This study presents a structured sEMG-based framework for motion intention recognition in upper-limb assistance tasks, integrating multi-channel acquisition, standardized preprocessing, time-domain feature extraction, and supervised learning. sEMG signals from four representative motions were collected, and eight time-domain features were extracted from denoised and segmented signal windows. A compact feature subset was identified through systematic evaluation. Five classifiers were benchmarked under consistent validation conditions, with Random Forest achieving the best performance and further optimized via K-fold cross-validation. The proposed method achieved an average intra-subject accuracy of 95.23% across eight subjects and 95.72% in online interactive validation. These results demonstrate that time-domain feature fusion combined with ensemble learning provides robust and efficient motion discrimination, highlighting its potential for real-time assistive and rehabilitation applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.