ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Real-Time Pain Assessment from Electrodermal Activity Using Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective pain assessment remains a significant challenge in clinical and research settings due to the subjective nature of self-reported measures. Physiological signals, particularly electrodermal activity (EDA), have emerged as promising indicators of autonomic responses associated with pain. Although recent advances in deep learning have improved the modelling of complex biosignals, many existing approaches remain computationally demanding, limiting their applicability for real-time monitoring in wearable and embedded systems. This paper proposes a fully convolutional network (FCN) for automated pain recognition using EDA signals. The proposed model is designed to efficiently capture temporal patterns in physiological data while maintaining low computational complexity. The approach is evaluated on the AI4Pain dataset for three-class pain classification (No Pain, Low Pain, High Pain). Experimental results show that the proposed FCN achieves an accuracy of 79.23% in offline evaluation. Furthermore, the model enables real-time inference with a latency of 0.47 ms, achieving 73.14% accuracy during real-time operation. These results demonstrate that convolutional architectures can provide an effective balance between predictive performance and computational efficiency, supporting the development of real-time physiological pain monitoring systems using wearable sensing technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.