ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Performance Gaps in Rowing and Identification of Key Training Monitoring Indicators.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although routine biomechanical monitoring in rowing increasingly relies on sensor-based and instrumented measurement systems that can capture multidimensional performance indicators with considerable precision, systematic approaches are still needed to integrate these sensor-derived data into a unified monitoring dataset and translate them into decision support for practice. This study aimed to construct a unified rowing training monitoring dataset from real-world sensor-derived biomechanical measurements, develop predictive models for athletes' performance gaps relative to target 2 km performance, and, for target attainment classification, identify key training monitoring indicators and evaluate their practical value in training practice. A total of 249 biomechanical testing records collected during the 2024-2025 season from the Chinese National Rowing Team were included. After standardized processing, 449 athlete-level records were generated for the primary analysis. Following exclusion of observations with missing primary regression labels, 172 modeling records were retained, corresponding to 87 test reports and 119 athletes. The primary regression outcome was the percentage time difference relative to target 2 km performance. XGBoost Regressor, Elastic Net, and LASSO were used for regression modeling, whereas Logistic Regression and XGBoost Classifier were used for the secondary classification task of target attainment. Internal validation was performed using grouped cross-validation at the athlete level, and model interpretation was supported by permutation importance, sparse linear coefficients, and robustness analyses. The results showed that all formal models outperformed their respective baseline models. In the primary regression task, XGBoost Regressor achieved the best performance in terms of MAE, whereas Elastic Net performed best in RMSE and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.