ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A U-Net Improved Version for Crop and Weed Segmentation from Aerial Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimization of herbicide application is one of the most important topics in Precision Agriculture, driven by both economic efficiency and ecological sustainability. Excessive herbicide use can lead to soil degradation, water contamination, and negative impacts on biodiversity, while also contributing to human health risks and climate-related concerns. Developing accurate, automated approaches for distinguishing crops from weeds is therefore essential to support sustainable agricultural practices. In this paper, a novel architecture for crops and weed segmentation in tobacco plantations is proposed: a U-Net variant which incorporates several specific design elements, including deep supervision, a Vegetation Global Context block, and a dual-headed output that separately predicts vegetation and crop masks. Weed regions are derived as the difference between vegetation and crop predictions, allowing the model to enforce logical consistency directly within a single framework, in contrast to other two-step approaches. The proposed architecture was evaluated using multiple modern encoder backbones (ConvNextV2, FastViT, RepViT, MambaVision). Experimental results demonstrate that this architecture not only improves segmentation accuracy compared to prior approaches, with best scores of 94.24% Dice for crop segmentation and 93.72% for weeds, but also significantly reduces inference time by avoiding multi-stage pipelines, making it well-suited for real-time deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.