ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Fall-from-Bed Risk Prediction Using Physics-Based Bed Simulation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fall-from-bed is a critical safety issue in hospitals and long-term care; however, large-scale real-fall data are rare, and collecting the data is ethically constrained. This study examined whether the fall-from-bed risk can be inferred from single static in-bed postures without temporal motion. We developed a physics-based bed-human simulator in MuJoCo and generated labeled episodes by sampling diverse initial configurations, rolling out uncontrolled dynamics for three seconds, and detecting falls by floor contact. Each initial state was represented as a 13-keypoint 2D skeleton in a bed-centric coordinate frame, normalized to fixed bed bounds, and supervised with a continuous risk label derived from time-to-fall using per-frame discounting on a 30 frame-per-second grid. On a pose-balanced simulated test set of 50,000 initial postures, the best-performing multilayer-perceptron-based predictor attained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9755, area under the precision-recall curve of 0.9771, F1-score of 0.9138, and mean squared error of 0.0374 (mean over five random seeds). Pose-stratified initialization improved performance relative to fully random sampling. Consistently high performance was observed across supine/prone/lateral subgroups, which improved with training set size. These results suggest that a static posture contains predictive information about fall risk under matched simulator dynamics, supporting the feasibility of posture-based risk scoring in the controlled settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.