Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42197769›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Printed Piezoelectric Materials: From Functional Inks to High-Performance Transducers.

Manuel Reis Carneiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Manuel Reis CarneiroDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3669-3457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Printable piezoelectric materials are emerging as a cornerstone of next-generation sensing, actuation, and energy harvesting technologies, driven by the need for lightweight, flexible, and digitally manufactured transducers. Conventional ceramic piezoelectrics offer exceptional electromechanical performance but require high-temperature sintering and exhibit intrinsic brittleness, limiting their integration with soft or unconventional substrates. Polymeric piezoelectrics, in contrast, provide mechanical compliance and low-temperature processability yet suffer from lower crystallinity, reduced piezoelectric coefficients, and limited thermal stability. These contrasting characteristics have catalyzed the development of functional piezoelectric inks-ceramic, polymeric, and hybrid formulations engineered for additive manufacturing techniques such as direct ink writing, stereolithography, screen printing, and inkjet printing. This review systematically examines the material compositions, dispersion chemistries, printing requirements, thermal treatment pathways, and poling strategies that govern the performance of printed piezoelectric transducers. By comparing ceramic-based, polymer-based, and hybrid systems, we reveal the fundamental trade-offs between printability, crystallinity, mechanical compliance, and electromechanical response, and map how these trade-offs shape device design across wearable electronics, soft robotics, and structural health monitoring. Finally, we highlight emerging approaches-including surface functionalization, low-temperature crystallization, liquid-phase sintering, and engineered ceramic-polymer interfaces-that offer promising routes to bridge the gap between printability and high piezoelectric performance.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingceramic–polymer hybridsdirect ink writinglow-temperature processingpiezoelectric inkspiezoelectric transducersprinted electronicsprinted transducersstereolithography

Identifiers

PMID42197769
PMCPMC13210510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.