ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Printed Piezoelectric Materials: From Functional Inks to High-Performance Transducers.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Printable piezoelectric materials are emerging as a cornerstone of next-generation sensing, actuation, and energy harvesting technologies, driven by the need for lightweight, flexible, and digitally manufactured transducers. Conventional ceramic piezoelectrics offer exceptional electromechanical performance but require high-temperature sintering and exhibit intrinsic brittleness, limiting their integration with soft or unconventional substrates. Polymeric piezoelectrics, in contrast, provide mechanical compliance and low-temperature processability yet suffer from lower crystallinity, reduced piezoelectric coefficients, and limited thermal stability. These contrasting characteristics have catalyzed the development of functional piezoelectric inks-ceramic, polymeric, and hybrid formulations engineered for additive manufacturing techniques such as direct ink writing, stereolithography, screen printing, and inkjet printing. This review systematically examines the material compositions, dispersion chemistries, printing requirements, thermal treatment pathways, and poling strategies that govern the performance of printed piezoelectric transducers. By comparing ceramic-based, polymer-based, and hybrid systems, we reveal the fundamental trade-offs between printability, crystallinity, mechanical compliance, and electromechanical response, and map how these trade-offs shape device design across wearable electronics, soft robotics, and structural health monitoring. Finally, we highlight emerging approaches-including surface functionalization, low-temperature crystallization, liquid-phase sintering, and engineered ceramic-polymer interfaces-that offer promising routes to bridge the gap between printability and high piezoelectric performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.