ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimodal Fusion of Environmental and Physiological Data for Real-World Personalised Comfort Modelling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People spend the majority of their lives within environments shaped by multiple interacting exposures, including thermal conditions, acoustic noise, lighting, and air quality, yet remain largely unaware of how these settings affect their comfort. Existing comfort research treats domains in isolation under controlled laboratory conditions, leaving real-world multi-domain effects on personal comfort underexplored. This paper proposes a unified Comfort Framework that fuses three practical data layers: macro-environmental conditions retrieved via location-based APIs, kinematic and micro-environmental context captured through smartphone sensors, and physiological responses recorded by a chest-worn ECG sensor. Binary comfort states are labelled in real time using a minimal-disruption lap-button protocol on a consumer smartwatch. We validate the pipeline through a single-subject pilot of 18 free-living sessions. Random Forest classification across 10 valid leave-one-session-out folds achieved an F1 macro of 0.456 ± 0.151, indicating that consumer wearable comfort prediction in unconstrained free-living conditions is more challenging than controlled chamber studies suggest. Descriptive statistics showed dataset-level differences between comfort states in wrist skin temperature (31.9 vs. 33.3 °C), heart rate (70.7 vs. 77.1 bpm), and RMSSD (42.1 vs. 34.3 ms), with overlap between classes consistent with the modest classification performance. SHAP analysis identified acoustic features, HRV features, and wrist temperature as the strongest comfort signals. The framework is architecturally designed to address all four IEQ domains, though this pilot empirically validated only thermal and acoustic signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.