ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Review of Robotic Weeding Modalities for Site-Specific Weed Management.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Weed control remains a critical challenge in modern crop production, particularly under increasing pressure to reduce chemical inputs and improve environmental sustainability. Recent advances in precision agriculture and robotic systems have enabled site-specific weed management, where interventions are applied selectively based on detected weed locations. While extensive research has focused on improving weed detection algorithms, comparatively less attention has been paid to the characteristics and constraints of different weeding modalities, which ultimately determine field performance. This review presents a systematic analysis of robotic weeding modalities from an actuation-oriented perspective. Specifically, we establish a comprehensive taxonomy of weeding approaches, including mechanical, chemical, thermal, laser-based, electrical, and other emerging methods, and analyze their underlying mechanisms and operational characteristics. Furthermore, we examine the coupling between sensing and actuation, highlighting how different intervention modalities impose distinct requirements on perception outputs. A scenario-based comparison framework is then developed to evaluate the suitability of different modalities across representative agricultural conditions, including pre-emergence control, in-row selective weeding, dense-row crop systems, and large weed situations. Based on this analysis, the limitations of single-modality systems are discussed, and emerging trends toward multi-modality integration and air-ground collaborative weed management are reviewed. Overall, this review shifts the focus from detection-centric approaches to the integration of sensing and actuation in robotic weeding systems and provides a decision-oriented framework to support the design, selection, and deployment of next-generation robotic weed management technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.