Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42197728›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Core Loss Modeling of Magnetic Components Using a Data-Driven Method.

Xinjian Gao, Shizhuang Yin, Zhonghua Cheng, Tielu Gao, Enzhi Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinjian GaoShijiazhuang Campus, Army Engineering University of PLA, Shijiazhuang 050003, China.
Shizhuang YinShijiazhuang Campus, Army Engineering University of PLA, Shijiazhuang 050003, China.
Zhonghua ChengShijiazhuang Campus, Army Engineering University of PLA, Shijiazhuang 050003, China.
Tielu GaoShijiazhuang Campus, Army Engineering University of PLA, Shijiazhuang 050003, China.
Enzhi DongShijiazhuang Campus, Army Engineering University of PLA, Shijiazhuang 050003, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on loss characteristics of magnetic components is a critical topic in power conversion technology. To address the significant discrepancies between existing core loss models and practical application requirements, this paper establishes a high-precision core loss evaluation model based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting. The model uses temperature, material, and excitation waveform as decision variables, with minimizing core loss as the objective. The study first evaluates the model through confusion matrices while conducting single-factor analyses of temperature, excitation waveform, and material using boxplots and investigating synergistic interactions between single factors. Subsequently, key metrics including coefficient of determination, mean squared error, and mean absolute error are employed for comprehensive regression assessment. Residual plots are utilized to examine the fit between predicted and actual values, demonstrating the model's high accuracy, strong applicability, and practical relevance, thereby validating its superiority. Finally, the paper explores maximizing magnetic energy transmission by solving the optimization problem using simulated annealing algorithms to determine conditions that achieve both minimum core loss and maximum transmission efficiency, extending the research to multi-objective optimization.

Indexed as

confusion matriceseXtreme gradient boostingmagnetic core lossmean absolute errormean squared errorsimulated annealing algorithms

Identifiers

PMID42197728
PMCPMC13211016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.