Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42197585›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Responses of Processing Tomato Genotypes Under Varying NaCl Stress Levels and Durations.

Mingya Zhang, Qi Wang, Yudong Liu, Huiying Liu, Wei Xu, Xinting Yang, Shengqun Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mingya ZhangDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Yudong LiuDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Huiying LiuDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Wei XuDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4954-395X
Xinting YangInformation Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Shengqun PangDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32360750The university-level fund of Shihezi University QS2023007"Tianshan Yingcai" Cultivation Program-Young Scientific and Technological Innovative Talents 2024TSYCCX0117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the escalating global problem of soil salinization severely limits the yield and quality of processing tomatoes. However, the differential responses and salt-tolerance strategies among processing tomato genotypes with different salt tolerances under salt stress remain largely elusive. Therefore, this study used salt-tolerant genotype 'S39' and salt-sensitive genotype 'S37' as materials. Seeds were sown in plug trays, and seedlings at the two-leaf-one-heart stage were transplanted into hydroponic containers filled with Hoagland nutrient solution. When seedlings reached the four-leaf-one-heart stage, they were exposed to NaCl treatments of 0 mM (control), 120 mM (Na120), and 180 mM (Na180). Plant samples were collected at 3, 6, and 9 days after treatment to determine growth parameters, physiological indices, and gene expression levels, aiming to reveal the dynamic differential responses to salt stress between the two processing tomato genotypes. The results demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of NaCl on the growth of processing tomatoes was aggravated with increasing NaCl concentration and treatment duration. The most significant difference in salt tolerance between the two genotypes was observed at 9 days under 180 mM NaCl treatment. At this sampling point, the relative salt-stress indices of superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, peroxidase (POD) activity, soluble sugar content, proline content, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll (a + b) in 'S39' were significantly higher than those in 'S37' by 31.55%, 53.40%, 66.70%, 65.07%, 20.80%, 15.74%, and 19.44%, respectively. In addition, Na contents in roots and stems, as well as K contents in stems and leaves, were significantly higher in 'S39' than in 'S37' by 43.40%, 8.67%, 22.08%, and 21.99%, respectively. In contrast, relative electrolyte leakage and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in 'S37' were 15.54% and 12.44% higher than those in 'S39'. In addition, photosynthetic parameters, including net photosynthetic rate (

Indexed as

element contentphotosynthetic characteristicsphysiological indicatorssalt stress

Identifiers

PMID42197585
PMCPMC13210603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.