ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Saudi Arabian Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Data-driven Atlas ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a major healthcare-associated infection in intensive care units (ICUs) and is associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased antimicrobial use, and high mortality. In Saudi Arabia, evidence on VAP epidemiology, microbiology, and outcomes is fragmented across settings. This study aimed to systematically review and synthesise the available evidence on VAP in Saudi Arabian ICUs. This study followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261332740). A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Studies from Saudi Arabia reporting VAP incidence in ICUs were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence per 1000 ventilator-days. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Analyses were performed using R. Seven studies involving a total of 15,844 patients, representing multicentre studies, national surveillance data, and single-centre cohorts across diverse ICU settings. The pooled incidence of VAP was 8.50 episodes per 1000 ventilator-days (95% CI: 3.23-13.78), with substantial heterogeneity (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.