ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Rhizosphere Microbiome Engineering for Climate-Smart Agriculture: From Synthetic Consortia to Precision Decision Support.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seed Biopriming for Climate Stress Resilience: Molecular, Physiological, and Epigenetic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Synthetic microbial communities for plant growth promotion and soil-borne disease suppression: design principles, mechanisms, and translational challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhizosphere microbiome engineering is a promising approach that can enhance crop resilience and input use efficiency by redirecting plant-microbe-soil interactions toward predictable functions. Here, we review the mechanistic bases underlying rhizosphere assembly and stability, including root exudate-mediated selection, priority effects, keystone taxa, and metabolite-driven signaling, and connect these principles to proposed design rules for microbial inoculants. We present a generalizable Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) framework for engineering synthetic microbial consortia, covering trait-to-module mapping (nutrient acquisition, phytohormone modulation, ACC deaminase activity, stress-protective metabolites, and biocontrol), compatibility screening, minimal yet robust community architectures, and iterative optimization driven by multi-omics and high-throughput phenotyping. Translation to field settings is framed as an engineering challenge defined by formulation and administration limitations, including carrier type, seed coating and encapsulation methods, shelf life, strain invasiveness, and permanence of colonization amid environmental diversity. We also summarize how integrative measurement pipelines (amplicon and shotgun sequencing, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and network or causal analyses) can advance microbiome studies from correlation to actionability. We describe how precision agriculture (sensors, remote sensing, and variable-rate inputs) and AI/ML (split-sample comparisons, transfer learning, and active learning) approaches can accelerate strain discovery, mixture optimization, and adaptive experimentation, driven by the need for stringent controls, metadata-rich reporting, and cross-site comparability. Use cases focus on stress conditions (drought, salinity, thermal extremes, and biotic stress) to demonstrate how microbial functions translate to agronomic outcomes and to highlight critical bottlenecks for reproducible, scalable microbiome products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.