ArticleMicroorganisms2026
Validation of a Pseudovirus Neutralization Assay for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron JN.1 and LP.8.1 Subvariant Lineage Strains with Homologous and Heterologous Matched Sera in Clinically Relevant Samples.
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pseudovirus neutralization (PNT) assay is an established high-throughput, robust, and efficient BSL-2 method for detecting neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 with the correlates of protection previously established for the ancestral (Wuhan) strain. The PNT assay was validated using nonmatched ancestral sera with anti-JN.1 cross-NAbs, clinically matched JN.1 sera with anti-JN.1 NAbs, or nonmatched JN.1 sera with anti-LP.8.1, KP.2, or KP.3 cross-reacting NAbs. In line with predefined validation acceptance criteria, the PNT assay was precise, with %GCV ≤ 50 in ~90-100%/200 results (40 samples/strain). The acceptance criteria were met for linearity (slope ranged from 1.041 for ancestral sera with anti-JN.1 NAbs to 1.213 for JN.1 sera with anti-KP.2 NAbs),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.