ArticleMicroorganisms2026
Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Vonoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy Versus Esomeprazole-Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy offers a simplified alternative; however, its efficacy and cost-effectiveness relative to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) in treatment-naïve patients remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the eradication rate and cost-effectiveness between the two groups using a propensity score-matched analysis. This retrospective, single-center study used outpatient electronic medical records from January 2024 to November 2025. After propensity score matching (1:1), 212 patients received vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VA), and 212 matched patients received esomeprazole-bismuth quadruple therapy (EBAC) for two weeks. Eradication rates and cost-effectiveness were compared. According to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, eradication rates were 90.56% (95% CI 85.88-93.81%) in the VA group and 90.09% (95% CI 85.33-93.43%) in the EBAC group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.