ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Clinical and Economic Value of Rapid Microbiological Diagnostics in Bloodstream Infections: A State-of-the-Art Evidence Review with Emphasis on PCR and MALDI-TOF.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Conventional diagnostics are limited by delayed results, often postponing appropriate antimicrobial therapy. This review aimed to evaluate the clinical and economic value of rapid microbiological diagnostics in BSI management. A state-of-the-art evidence synthesis was conducted using structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EconLit, and Google Scholar (2013-2025). Eligible studies included economic evaluations and clinical studies reporting downstream economic or resource-use outcomes. Screening and data extraction were performed by two reviewers, and findings were narratively synthesized. Fifty-nine studies were included. Rapid diagnostics consistently reduced time to pathogen identification and targeted therapy compared to conventional methods. Molecular platforms provided results within hours, while MALDI-TOF enabled identification within 30-60 min after culture positivity. Clinical benefits included earlier therapy optimization, reduced mortality, and shorter hospital stays, particularly when combined with antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). Economic evaluations demonstrated improved cost-effectiveness, including reduced hospitalization, ICU utilization, and antimicrobial costs. MALDI-TOF with stewardship showed notable cost savings and improved outcomes. However, results varied depending on implementation context, infrastructure, and workflow integration. Rapid microbiological diagnostics offer significant clinical and economic benefits in BSI management, particularly when integrated with stewardship programs. Context-specific implementation is essential to maximize their value across healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.