Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42197349›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2026

Biofiltration of Bioaerosols Emitted from Organic Waste Management Facilities: A Review.

Andrés M Vélez-Pereira, Pablo Bravo Barra, Yiniva Camargo Caicedo, David J O'Connor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrés M Vélez-PereiraDepartamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Tarapacá, Av. 18 de Septiembre 2222, Arica 1000000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1557-8684
Pablo Bravo BarraDepartamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica 1000000, Chile.
Yiniva Camargo CaicedoPrograma de Ingeniería Ambiental y Sanitaria, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Magdalena, Calle 29H3 No. 22-01, Santa Marta 470004, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5641-1939
David J O'ConnorSchool of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, D09 E432 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1233-2769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioaerosol emissions from biological treatment processes like composting, livestock operations, and wastewater plants pose notable occupational and environmental health risks. Biofiltration is a common mitigation measure for gaseous pollutants, but its effectiveness in controlling bioaerosols is less studied. This review synthesizes current evidence on biofiltration for the removal of bioaerosols. Findings indicate that biofiltration can significantly reduce emissions from waste-related biological processes, although results vary widely and depend heavily on design and operational factors. In composting, agricultural, and wastewater treatment contexts, fungal bioaerosols are consistently removed with high efficiency, often over 90%. Conversely, bacterial removal shows greater variability, from negligible to above 90%, influenced primarily by airflow rate, bed depth, and media stability. Systems with residence times of tens of seconds and bed depths of at least 1 m tend to reliably reduce bacterial counts, whereas undersized, high-flow systems experience marked efficiency losses. The choice of packing material is also crucial; mature, stable media maintain performance, whereas nutrient-rich or unstable substrates can lead to fungal emissions, turning the biofilter into a secondary source. Data on endotoxin removal are limited and remain insufficient for firm design recommendations. Overall, biofiltration's effectiveness depends on complex interactions among physical retention, biological stability, and design. These insights emphasize the need for future research to focus on standardized, performance-based design criteria supported by consistent reporting and full-scale validation.

Indexed as

biofilter designbiological aerosolemission controlendotoxinspacking mediarisk mitigation

Identifiers

PMID42197349
PMCPMC13209877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.