ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning and the Use of Spectroscopy for Adulteration Detection in Turmeric Powder.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidics-Integrated Spectroscopic Technologies for Food Safety and Quality Assessment: From Complex-Matrix Processing to On-Site Decision-Making.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Learning Compact Multispectral Signatures for Geographical-Origin Authentication ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aimed to develop a rapid, non-destructive, and accurate method for detecting adulteration in turmeric using Visible-Near-Infrared (UV/Vis and NIR) spectroscopy combined with machine learning algorithms. Spectral data from the samples were collected and analyzed in two ranges: 170-870 nm (UV/Vis) and 900-2170 nm (NIR). Four supervised learning algorithms, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) neural network, and Decision Tree, were evaluated for modeling. To quantitatively assess model performance, we employed not only the accuracy metric but also complementary performance indicators including precision, recall, and the F1-score to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of classification effectiveness. The models developed in the 900-2170 nm spectral range demonstrated highly significant performance, with most models achieving 100% accuracy on the independent test set. To reduce data dimensionality and enhance computational efficiency, a hybrid feature selection method combining SVM with five algorithms-League Championship Algorithm (LCA), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA)-was employed. Upon evaluation of each method, the SVM-LCA was selected as the optimal feature selection technique. This algorithm successfully extracted the most effective wavelengths with the highest correlation and lowest error, which maintained or improved the accuracy of the classification models. This study confirms the high potential of UV/Vis and NIR spectroscopy as rapid, non-destructive, and precise tools for detecting adulteration in turmeric. The findings can pave the way for the development of intelligent quality control systems in the food and pharmaceutical industries, playing a crucial role in ensuring consumer health and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.