ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Role of Selected Organic Additives in Sulfate-Based Electroplating Baths for Copper Electrodeposition Toward Additive Manufacturing.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise control of copper electrodeposition is essential for electrochemical additive manufacturing based on layer-by-layer growth. In this work, the influence of selected organic additives, nicotinic acid, benzotriazole, thiourea and urea in sulfate-based electroplating baths was investigated with respect to their applicability in electrodeposition-driven 3D printing. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was used to analyze the electrochemical behavior of Cu(II) reduction, while copper layers were deposited under potentiostatic conditions in a flow-assisted system (potential controlled conditions). The obtained deposits were characterized by SEM/EDS and quantitative measurements of layer thickness and dendrite height. The results show that the additives strongly affect both deposition kinetics and the morphology of electrodeposited layers. Benzotriazole acts as a strong inhibitor, producing fine-grained structures but reducing deposition efficiency and not fully suppressing vertical growth instabilities. Thiourea leads to highly unstable deposition with excessive dendritic growth and increased impurity incorporation. Nicotinic acid enables relatively thick deposits with moderate dendrite formation within an optimal concentration range. In contrast, urea provides the most stable growth, yielding uniform layers with minimal dendritic development and high copper purity. The dendrite height-to-layer thickness ratio proved to be an effective descriptor of electrodeposition growth stability. These findings highlight the critical role of additive selection in optimizing electroplating baths for electrochemical 3D printing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.