ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Experimental Design and Optimization of Dispersion Systems in Fine and Specialty Chemical Fabrication.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review describes a process design concept suitable for the fine and specialty chemicals sector. Experimental design and optimization methodologies are powerful tools for developing and improving a wide range of products, processes, and engineering systems. The research articles thoroughly analyzed in this review demonstrate that, regardless of the analytical techniques employed or the specific processes used in the fabrication of fine and specialty chemicals, the systematic implementation of the Design of Experiments and Response Surface Methodology consistently enables the development of high-quality and reproducible outcomes. Across all the studies discussed, comparing newly developed or modified processes with conventional approaches, the application of statistically designed experiments and structured multivariate analysis resulted in significant improvements in key performance indicators. These include increased product yield, reduced process times, enhanced purity, and more precise control over the targeted functional properties of specialty and fine chemicals. Good examples that illustrate the above problem are three studies supported by data from our previously published work and our current research project, in which experimental design and process optimization play major roles in obtaining valuable nanostructured materials. These case studies-rational liquid-in-liquid nanodispersions (ND) for ecological graffiti-coating detergents, solid-in-solid nanodispersions for functionalized sustainable cementitious composites, and solid-in-liquid multicharge cationic surfactant-capped silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)-are deliberately selected to illustrate how the same systematic design and optimization principles can be applied across distinct types of dispersed systems. Together, they demonstrate a coherent methodological progression from formulation to functional material development, highlighting the versatility of this approach across different material states and application domains. The findings of this review provide a solid foundation for the optimized manufacture of novel custom-designed nanoproducts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.