Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42197047›Full record

ArticleNutrients2026

Designing a Food Frequency Questionnaire for a Vegetarian Population in Germany by Means of Mixed-Integer Linear Programming.

Julia Blaurock, Thorsten Heuer, Kurt Gedrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia BlaurockResearch Group Public Health Nutrition, ZIEL-Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 1, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9536-0866
Thorsten HeuerDepartment of Nutritional Behaviour, Max Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Haid-und-Neu-Straße 9, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-7829
Kurt GedrichResearch Group Public Health Nutrition, ZIEL-Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 1, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7321-2555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood frequency questionnaires (FFQs) are important tools for dietary assessment in large epidemiological studies, playing a crucial role in evaluating the relationship between diet and health. However, adapting the food lists in FFQs to align with specific study objectives or target populations presents a considerable challenge.

methodsThe present study develops a framework using mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) to minimize the food list of an FFQ using a vegetarian population in Germany as a proof of concept. Constraints of the optimization ensured that the selected food items have a certain nutrient coverage and variance coverage, as well as an appropriate aggregation level. Nutrient intake for three scenarios for FFQs was compared with 24 h recalls (24HR) using R

resultsLength of minimized FFQs increased with a higher proportion of nutrient coverage and variance coverage. Including aggregation of food items produced shorter FFQs than FFQs that only contain food items at a lower aggregation level. R

conclusionsMILP offers a reliable and data-driven framework for compiling optimized FFQs.

Indexed as

Diet SurveysDiet, VegetarianProgramming, LinearVegetariansGermanyHumansNutrition AssessmentPortion SizeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesdietary assessmentfood frequency questionnairemixed-integer linear programmingnutritional epidemiologyproof of conceptvegetarian diet

Identifiers

PMID42197047
PMCPMC13209905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.