ReviewNutrients2026
Protective Strategies Against Glyphosate and Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Toxicity: Mechanisms, Experimental Evidence, and Translational Limitations.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Glyphosate (GLY) and glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) are widely used agrochemicals. Experimental studies have reported oxidative stress, inflammatory activation, mitochondrial impairment, endocrine-related effects, and organ injury following GLY/GBH exposure; however, candidate mitigation approaches have not been comprehensively summarized across experimental systems. (2) Methods: This structured narrative review followed SANRA recommendations. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched (January 2004-January 2026). In total, 37 experimental studies met the inclusion criteria, describing 23 compounds categorized as vitamins, antioxidants, or enzyme modulators, dietary supplements, plant extracts, humic substances, hormonal modulators, and other natural compounds. (3) Results: Across models, reported protective effects most consistently involved attenuation of oxidative damage, including reductions in lipid peroxidation, oxidative DNA damage markers, and partial restoration of endogenous antioxidant defenses. Several interventions also modulated inflammatory signaling, apoptosis-associated markers, and stress response signaling. Protective effects were generally dose-dependent and more frequently observed in pre-treatment or co-exposure paradigms; complete normalization of outcomes was uncommon. Interpretation across studies was limited by heterogeneity in exposure conditions, test systems, endpoints, and, critically, by differences between pure GLY and GBHs. (4) Conclusions: Experimental evidence supports the mechanistic plausibility of antioxidant and stress response modulation as candidate approaches to mitigate GLY/GBH-induced toxicity. However, substantial methodological variability, frequent use of high-dose or non-representative exposure paradigms, and the absence of human interventional data limit translational relevance. Future studies should prioritize standardized, formulation-specific designs with exposure scenarios aligned to real-world conditions and include systematic safety assessment of proposed interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.