Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42196956›Full record

ArticleNutrients2026

Breastfeeding Recommendations: Torn Between Evidence and Emotions-A Commentary.

Berthold V Koletzko, Frank Jochum, Martina Kohl-Sobania, Walter A Mihatsch, Diana Rubin

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Berthold V KoletzkoDr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians Universität Munich, Lindwurmstrasse 4, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5345-7165
Frank JochumEvangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, 13589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4259-5562
Martina Kohl-SobaniaDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5138-9528
Walter A MihatschFaculty of Health Management, Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences, 89231 Neu Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0152-9830
Diana RubinCenter for Nutritional Medicine and Diabetology, Vivantes Klinikum Berlin-Reinickendorf and Berlin-Spandau, 13509 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently published German evidence-based guideline on "Breastfeeding Duration" recommends that infants in Germany should be exclusively or predominantly breastfed for 6 months, with a total breastfeeding duration of 12 months. These recommendations rely exclusively on low- and very low-certainty evidence, and fall short of what would be expected for an evidence-based guideline. The guideline has been criticized by a large number of eight professional organizations, which is very unusual. As delegates or deputy delegates of our respective medical-scientific societies participating in the six-year guideline development process, we disagree with the published guideline recommendations and present here our key methodological and content-related concerns. In our view, there is no sufficient evidence that would demonstrate superiority of the proposed recommendation with respect to benefits and harms compared to the long-standing recommendation of exclusive breastfeeding for 4-6 months and continued breastfeeding for as long as mother and child desire for healthy populations in Germany and Western Europe.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingEmotionsEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGermanyHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPractice Guidelines as Topicbreastfeedingcomplementary feedingevidence-based medicineevidence gapimplicit bias

Identifiers

PMID42196956
PMCPMC13209821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.