Accuracy and Agreement of a 45 mg Versus a 75 mg

Jun Huang, Yaohong Xie, Jian Huang, Bingyun Lu, Ye Chen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

Reply to Di Ciaula, A.; Portincasa, P. Comment on "Huang et al. Accuracy and Agreement of a 45 mg Versus a 75 mgDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Article
Comment on Huang et al. Accuracy and Agreement of a 45 mg Versus a 75 mgDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, China.

Yaohong XieGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, China.

Jian HuangIntegrative Microecology Clinical Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Disease, Shenzhen Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Shenzhen Technology Research Center of Gut Microbiota Transplantation, Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China.

Bingyun LuIntegrative Microecology Clinical Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Disease, Shenzhen Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Shenzhen Technology Research Center of Gut Microbiota Transplantation, Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China.

Ye ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, China.

Funding

Research Foundation of Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University PY2022YM06Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Disease ZDSYS20220606100800002Shenzhen Medical Research Fund C2401027Shenzhen Science and Technology Program KCXFZ20211020163558024Shenzhen Science and Technology Program LCYSSQ20220823091405012

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

13C-urea breath testdiagnostic accuracydiagnostic agreementHelicobacter pylorirandomized crossover trial

Identifiers

PMID42196933

DOI10.3390/diagnostics16101567

PMCPMC13205361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.