Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42196906›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cytology: Opportunities and Limitations in Screening, Triage, and Diagnostic Support.

Agata Stanek-Widera, Jędrzej Borowczak, Dominik Skiba, Michel-Edwar Mickael, Marzena Łazarczyk, Mateusz Maniewski, Łukasz Szylberg, Andrey Bychkov, Piotr Religa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Agata Stanek-WideraFaculty of Medicine, Academy of Silesia, 40-555 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5221-4524
Jędrzej BorowczakFaculty of Medicine, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Aleje Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-3285
Dominik SkibaInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5910-2955
Michel-Edwar MickaelInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-4900
Marzena ŁazarczykInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Mateusz ManiewskiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Oncology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Bydgoszcz, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5713-0135
Łukasz SzylbergDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Oncology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Bydgoszcz, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1349-5906
Andrey BychkovDepartment of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4203-5696
Piotr ReligaDepartment of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a major global health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where access to screening, vaccination, and timely treatment may be limited. Cervical cytology has played an important historical role in prevention, but it is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and subject to observer variability and limited sensitivity. In many contemporary screening programs, HPV testing is now used as the primary screening test, while cytology is used mainly for the triage of HPV-positive women. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), has shown considerable potential in medical image analysis and computer-aided diagnosis. This review summarizes current applications of AI in cervical cytology and related diagnostic workflows, including automated and assisted slide screening, liquid-based cytology, the triage of equivocal or HPV-positive cases, and colposcopy support. Across these settings, AI-assisted systems may improve efficiency, standardization, and diagnostic consistency, and may reduce workload in resource-constrained environments. However, the evidence is heterogeneous, and important challenges remain, including the need for large and diverse datasets, prospective validation, regulatory approval, digital infrastructure, workflow integration, and the resolution of ethical and legal issues. AI should therefore be regarded as a promising adjunct to human expertise rather than a replacement in cervical cytology and related clinical diagnostic pathways.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecytologydigital diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID42196906
PMCPMC13206617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.