ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cytology: Opportunities and Limitations in Screening, Triage, and Diagnostic Support.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a major global health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where access to screening, vaccination, and timely treatment may be limited. Cervical cytology has played an important historical role in prevention, but it is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and subject to observer variability and limited sensitivity. In many contemporary screening programs, HPV testing is now used as the primary screening test, while cytology is used mainly for the triage of HPV-positive women. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), has shown considerable potential in medical image analysis and computer-aided diagnosis. This review summarizes current applications of AI in cervical cytology and related diagnostic workflows, including automated and assisted slide screening, liquid-based cytology, the triage of equivocal or HPV-positive cases, and colposcopy support. Across these settings, AI-assisted systems may improve efficiency, standardization, and diagnostic consistency, and may reduce workload in resource-constrained environments. However, the evidence is heterogeneous, and important challenges remain, including the need for large and diverse datasets, prospective validation, regulatory approval, digital infrastructure, workflow integration, and the resolution of ethical and legal issues. AI should therefore be regarded as a promising adjunct to human expertise rather than a replacement in cervical cytology and related clinical diagnostic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.