ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Point-of-Care Ultrasound Use in Cardiac Arrest Patients.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over 350,000 patients experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the United States. Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) in cardiac arrest are critically ill and require emergent clinical decisions and treatment. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is useful as a rapid, bedside diagnostic imaging tool to help elucidate possible causes of cardiac arrest and guide management. Using a validated systematic approach such as the SHoC and CASA protocols, clinicians can safely perform POCUS with shortened pauses during pulse checks. POCUS is key in evaluating cardiac arrhythmias such as ventricular fibrillation (VF), which has higher survival rates with defibrillation, versus cardiac standstill, which has higher mortality per recent research studies. When performed by experienced users, POCUS also facilitates identification of reversible causes for improved cardiac arrest patient outcomes and can guide decisions in resuscitative efforts. In summary, this manuscript is a narrative review that illustrates identifiable POCUS findings and synthesizes them to guide potential emergent intervention in patients in cardiac arrest including: ventricular fibrillation, cardiac standstill, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, right heart strain such as from acute pulmonary embolism, reduced cardiac function, wall motion abnormality, ruptured ventricular pseudoaneurysm, and aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.