Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42196755›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Patient Perspectives on Quantified Self Technologies and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Diabetes in Zimbabwe.

Belinda Mutunhu, Baldreck Chipangura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Belinda MutunhuDepartment of Information Systems, School of Computing, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0003, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6046-3240
Baldreck ChipanguraDepartment of Information Systems, School of Computing, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Pretoria 0003, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5334-0808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing use of quantified self-technologies (QST) in chronic disease management is linked to better self-monitoring and patient engagement. However, little is known about how patients in resource-constrained settings fund and sustain the use of QST in diabetes self-management. This study asked: "How do patients with diabetes perceive and experience the economic burden of using QST in Zimbabwe?" Using a qualitative design, 20 patients with diabetes participated in semi-structured interviews. The reflexive thematic analysis of Braun and Clarke generated three interrelated themes: technology investment costs, conventional healthcare costs, and socio-economic constraints. The findings show that the economic experience of QST adoption is context-dependent and is shaped by the financial realities of patients with diabetes and their access to technology. By focusing on patient-level cost experiences, the study adds qualitative evidence to public health debates on digital health affordability and highlights the need to assess perceived financial implications within a third-world socio-economic context. It is concluded that, although QST is available in third-world countries, sustained use depends on the financial capacity of patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHealth Care CostsSelf CareSelf-ManagementAdultDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedZimbabweaffordabilitydiabetes managementdigital healthhealthcare costslow and middle-income countriespublic healthquantified self-technologiessocio-economic determinantsZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID42196755
PMCPMC13206934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.