ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Preservation-to-Precision in Severe Early Childhood Caries: A Narrative Review of Silver Diamine Fluoride-When "Buying Time" Must Not Become "Selling Time".
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe early childhood caries (SECC) in preschool children is a progressive, multifactorial disease with far-reaching consequences for child health, family functioning, and health systems. Minimally invasive dentistry (MID), particularly 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF), is increasingly used to arrest lesions and "buy time" when definitive restorative care is delayed. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence-based guidelines and real-world utilization data to clarify the appropriate role and limits of SDF in SECC management. Professional guidance supports SDF for lesion arrest within an ongoing caries management plan, but does not endorse it as a universal long-term substitute for durable restorative care. Observational studies show that many SDF-treated primary teeth receive additional intervention within approximately 2 years, and any delay in sedation/general anesthesia is typically measured in weeks to months. A large recent private practice study found that 35% of children with caries progressed to higher-intensity treatment (restoration or extraction) over a median of 547 days, reinforcing the time-limited nature of interim stabilization. We propose a "preservation-to-precision" framework that prioritizes child-centered outcomes-freedom from pain and infection, durable function, and acceptable psychosocial impact-through risk-based, tooth- and child-specific planning, realistic follow-up assessment, and clear exit criteria for transition to definitive care. In high-income settings, the ethical value of "buying time" depends on whether systems use that time to advance children toward timely, definitive care rather than normalizing prolonged temporization as routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.