Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42196735›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Effectiveness of Traditional vs. Modern Contraception According to the 2017 IDHS: The Urgent Need for Rights-Based Counseling in Indonesia's Family Planning Program.

Siti Dariyani, Budi Utomo, Eflita Meiyetriani, Sudibyo Alimoeso, Maria Gayatri, Sukma Rahayu, Restu Octasila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siti DariyaniDoctoral Program in Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
Budi UtomoDepartment of Population and Biostatistics, Center for Health Research, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8733-5975
Eflita MeiyetrianiSoutheast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Regional Centre for Food and Nutrition (SEAMEO RECFON), East Jakarta 13120, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-0811-9981
Sudibyo AlimoesoIndonesian Demographic Association, Jakarta 13610, Indonesia.
Maria GayatriMinistry of Population and Family Planning Development/National Population and Family Planning Board, Jakarta 13610, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2792-5586
Sukma RahayuDepartment of Population and Biostatistics, Center for Health Research, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8282-7073
Restu OctasilaDoctoral Program in Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe increasing use of traditional contraceptive methods in Indonesia may raise the risk of unintended pregnancies, while modern contraceptive use has stagnated and often experiences discontinuation. Nevertheless, contraceptive choice is an individual right and should guide family planning programs. This study aimed to estimate contraceptive effectiveness based on pregnancy risk and dropout rates and to examine the socio-demographic characteristics of users.

methodsThis cross-sectional study with a retrospective cohort approach used calendar data from the 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS). The study population included all contraceptive use episodes within five years, resulting in 46,461 episodes. Data were obtained from the 2017 IDHS socio-demographic questionnaire and contraceptive calendar. Multivariate logistic regression was used for analysis.

resultsThere was no significant difference in dropout rates between traditional and modern contraceptive users (OR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.79-1.05). However, users of traditional methods had a 2.46-times higher risk of pregnancy compared with modern method users (95% CI = 2.19-2.76). Traditional contraceptive use was more common among women aged 40-49 years, with parity ≥ 5, higher education, and higher economic status, living in urban areas, and residing in Sumatra, Kalimantan, and Sulawesi (

conclusionsTraditional contraceptive use is associated with a higher risk of pregnancy. Strengthening counseling services through comprehensive, pluralistic, and participatory approaches is essential while respecting individuals' rights in contraceptive choice.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive EffectivenessCounselingFamily Planning ServicesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndonesiaMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultdropoutpregnancy risksociodemographictraditional contraception

Identifiers

PMID42196735
PMCPMC13207340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.