Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42196732›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Comparative Analysis of Psychosocial Risks and Leadership in Municipal Government Agencies: A Study Based on NOM-035-STPS-2018 in Zacatecas, Mexico.

Sonia Villagrán Rueda, Lisandro José Alvarado-Peña, Luis Alfredo Vega Osuna, Flor de la Cruz Salaiza Lizárraga, Ma Loecelia Guadalupe Ruvalcaba Sánchez, Bertha Lucía Santos-Hernández, Rodolfo Valentín Muñóz Castorena, Wilfred Fabián Rivera Martínez

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sonia Villagrán RuedaAcademic Unit of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas 98066, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5389-574X
Lisandro José Alvarado-PeñaAcademic Management, Universidad Tecnológica de Escuinapa, Escuinapa 82400, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5097-811X
Luis Alfredo Vega OsunaEconomic-Administrative Department, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Culiacán Rosales 80020, Mexico.
Flor de la Cruz Salaiza LizárragaEconomic and Administrative Sciences, Instituto Tecnológico de Culiacán, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Ciudad de México 03330, Mexico.
Ma Loecelia Guadalupe Ruvalcaba SánchezCentro de Investigación en Ciencias de Información Geoespacial, A.C., Ciudad de México 14240, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-9032
Bertha Lucía Santos-HernándezFaculty of Administration, Accounting and Law, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Coahuila 25000, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6336-3413
Rodolfo Valentín Muñóz CastorenaDepartment of Quantitative Methods, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44100, Mexico.
Wilfred Fabián Rivera MartínezFaculty of Administrative Sciences, Universidad Uniautónoma del Cauca, Popayán 190001, Colombia.

Funding

Instituti de Investigaciones de la Red REOALCEI 5.000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The public sector constitutes a complex system of psycho-affective management, where leadership and autonomy are crucial for institutional efficacy. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between leadership, autonomy (control over work), and other psychosocial risk factors across six departments of a government agency in Mexico, under the framework of NOM-035-STPS-2018. A quantitative, cross-sectional, and correlational design was utilized with 235 public servants, employing Reference Guide III of the official standard to identify psychosocial risk categories. The results, analyzed through Welch and Games-Howell tests, reveal significant differences based on the operational nature of each unit. Public Safety and Civil Protection present critical risks due to high demand and low control. The Municipal DIF (System for the Integral Development of the Family) stands out as a protective environment thanks to its positive leadership. A statistically significant association was identified between lower leadership quality and a decrease in work autonomy (

Indexed as

Government AgenciesLeadershipCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMexicoRisk Factorsleadershipoccupational healthpsychosocial riskspublic administrationwork autonomy

Identifiers

PMID42196732
PMCPMC13207254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.