ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
What Drives Nutritional Supplement Use Among Academics? An Intention-Behavior Model of Motivation, Work Stress, and Digital Influences.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional supplement use has emerged as an important health-related consumption behavior in digitalized environments, with implications for both public health and individual well-being. While prior research has largely focused on general populations, limited attention has been paid to how occupational pressures and digital information contexts jointly shape supplement-related decision-making among highly educated professionals. Addressing this gap, this study examines the behavioral determinants of nutritional supplement use among academics within an intention-behavior framework. Using survey data collected from academic professionals, the proposed model was tested through confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that health motivation and academic work stress significantly predict supplement use intention, which, in turn, strongly influences actual consumption behavior. In contrast, digital health literacy and digital marketing exposure do not exert significant direct effects on usage intention. These results provide theoretical insight into the boundary conditions of informational determinants in consumer behavior models, suggesting that intrinsic motivation and contextual stressors may play a more dominant role than digital influences among highly educated consumers. From a practical perspective, the findings highlight the importance of addressing stress-related health coping mechanisms and motivation-driven behaviors in promoting informed supplement use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.